MendixOne platform to build the workflows, agents and applications your hybrid workforce runs on.
vs
Microsoft Power AppsLow-code AI app builder for custom business apps
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Mendix vs Microsoft Power Apps
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 33.1 for Mendix, and ranks ahead in 85% of the answers that name both.
Choose Mendix if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 22301 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO 9001 or PCI DSS Level 1 service provider or NEN 7510 or FedRAMP (Mendix Cloud for US Government) coverage
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex applications
- Strong model-driven, high-productivity development
- Cloud-native, multi-experience development
Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 33.1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 42% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Mendix | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 33.1% | 55.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.6% | up+0.2% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #3 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 7.8% | 9.8% |
| Mentions this run | 45 | 55 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Mendix +1.6000000000000014pp · Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MendixMicrosoft Power Apps
Head to head in AI answers
40 engine answers name both brands
6Mendix ranked higher
34Microsoft Power Apps ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Mendix | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is a low-code platform and when does a company need one? | ChatGPT | #3 | #1 |
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #2 | #1 |
| What features matter most in a low-code platform? | ChatGPT | #3 | #2 |
| What is the difference between a low-code platform and a traditional application framework? | ChatGPT | #3 | #1 |
| How long does it take to roll out a low-code platform? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
| How long does it take to roll out a low-code platform? | AI Mode | #3 | #1 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #13 | #4 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #5 | #3 |
| Top low-code platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #5 | #6 |
| Best low-code platform for enterprise | ChatGPT | #2 | #3 |
| Best low-code platform for enterprise | AI Mode | #2 | #3 |
| Best low-code platform for enterprise | Perplexity | #3 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Mendix | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $1,090 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Public cloud, private cloud or air-gapped environments | Microsoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 22301, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO 9001, PCI DSS Level 1 service provider, NEN 7510, FedRAMP (Mendix Cloud for US Government) | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Free Online Academy with learning paths and certifications, Standard support plan, 9 AM to 5 PM, Premium support plan, 24/7, Expert Services for onboarding and scaling | Documentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community |
| Founded | 2005 | — |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | Redmond, Washington |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Funding round (no lead investor or valuation given) · $38M raised | — |
| Best for | Enterprises building department-wide business applications and mission-critical core systems | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together |
Plans side by side
Mendix
Free$0month
Standard (One App)$1,090month (starting at)
Standard (Unlimited Apps)$2,725month (starting at)
PremiumCustomcontact sales
Microsoft Power Apps
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Mendix
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex applications
- Strong model-driven, high-productivity development
- Cloud-native, multi-experience development
- Bridges citizen developers and professional developers
- Strong for enterprise and industrial application development
- Costs less predictable due to infrastructure and add-ons
- Free plan limited to one app with production and scaling limits
- Enterprise tiers can be expensive, starting around $1,090 per month
Microsoft Power Apps
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mendix vs Microsoft Power Apps”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mendix-vs-microsoft-power-apps, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.