Microsoft Power Apps vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 3.6 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 3.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 18% positive)
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
Choose Supabase if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Microsoft Power Apps | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 55.6% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.2% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #1 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 9.8% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 55 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Microsoft Power Apps | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a low-code platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #4 | #1 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #4 | #12 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | ChatGPT | #1 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Microsoft Power Apps | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Microsoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Documentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | — | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, Washington | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Microsoft Power Apps
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Microsoft Power Apps
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Microsoft Power Apps vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/microsoft-power-apps-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.