MySQLThe world's most popular open source database
vs
SingleStoreThe real-time database for AI, apps and analytics
Comparison · Data Warehouse · weekly run Nov 3
MySQL vs SingleStore
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
MySQL is the stronger AI pick in Data Warehouse: it has a visibility score of 4.2 versus 0 for SingleStore.
Choose MySQL if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.2 vs 0)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- well suited to transactional workloads
- common primary production database with read replicas
Choose SingleStore if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA or Privacy Shield or PCI DSS v4.0.1 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | MySQL | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.2% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Data Warehouse | #18 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
MySQL 0pp · SingleStore 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
MySQL leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MySQLSingleStore
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0MySQL ranked higher
0SingleStore ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | MySQL | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $0.99 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud service (HeatWave) and self-managed software using a client-server model, also available as an embeddable library | Managed cloud service on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, plus self-managed deployments and a bring-your-own-cloud option |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, Privacy Shield, PCI DSS v4.0.1 |
| Support | 24x7 direct technical support from MySQL engineers via MySQL Enterprise Edition | Self-support on the free tier, Standard Support on paid tiers, Talk to a specialist, Technical support request |
| Founded | — | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States (parent Oracle's headquarters) | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series C · $39M raised | Series F-2 (led by Goldman Sachs) · $558M raised |
| Best for | Web-based applications, and ISVs, OEMs and VARs embedding a database in their products | Teams building real-time applications, analytics and AI features that need live data without copies |
Plans side by side
MySQL
Pricing not available.
SingleStore
Shared$0free workspace
Standard$0.99hour (starts at)
BYOC StandardCustomcontact us
Enterprise$1.49hour (starts at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
MySQL
- well suited to transactional workloads
- common primary production database with read replicas
SingleStore
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “MySQL vs SingleStore”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mysql-vs-singlestore, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.