n8n vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 1.3 for n8n, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose n8n if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 18% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 1.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | n8n | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.3% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.6% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #40 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
n8n −1.5999999999999999pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | n8n | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a low-code platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #8 | #1 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #17 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | n8n | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Integrations | 2000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series C · $240M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
n8n
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “n8n vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/n8n-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.