MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
vs
n8nFlexible AI workflow automation for technical teams.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Make vs n8n
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
n8n is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 22 versus 17 for Make, and ranks ahead in 63% of the answers that name both.
Choose Make if…
- You need more native integrations (3500+ vs 2000+)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
Choose n8n if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22 vs 17)
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 41% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17% | 22% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #9 | #5 |
| Share of voice | 3.6% | 4.4% |
| Mentions this run | 24 | 30 |
| Positive in AI answers | 41% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Make 0pp · n8n 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
n8n leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Maken8n
Head to head in AI answers
19 engine answers name both brands
7Make ranked higher
12n8n ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI agent platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #12 | #9 |
| What should an AI agent platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #14 | #15 |
| What are the best AI Agents tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #14 | #7 |
| Top AI agent platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #8 | #4 |
| Best AI agent platform for startups | Perplexity | #6 | #1 |
| Which AI agent platform has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #6 | #2 |
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | Perplexity | #11 | #10 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI agent platform | ChatGPT | #4 | #1 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI agent platform | Perplexity | #9 | #2 |
| Best AI agent platform with AI features | Perplexity | #1 | #3 |
| Most affordable AI agent platform that is still reliable | ChatGPT | #2 | #1 |
| Most affordable AI agent platform that is still reliable | Perplexity | #1 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. |
| Integrations | 3500+ | 2000+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series C · $240M raised |
| Best for | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs n8n”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-n8n, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.