Skip to content
SlateIndex
NetdataReal-time observability with per-second metrics, logs and traces, and AI troubleshooting.
vs
TempoOpen-source, high-scale distributed tracing backend
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Netdata vs Tempo

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Tempo is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 7.1 versus 1.2 for Netdata, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Netdata if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 6% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • real-time, high-granularity infrastructure monitoring
  • strong server monitoring

Choose Tempo if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.1 vs 1.2)
  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Open-source and cost-effective

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Netdata Tempo
Visibility score1.2%7.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#28#12
Share of voice0.5%3.1%
Mentions this run318
Positive in AI answers100%6%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Netdata 1%

Netdata 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Tempo leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
8%
AI Mode
1.3%
11.5%
Perplexity
2.2%
1.9%
NetdataTempo

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Netdata ranked higher
0Tempo ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionNetdataTempo
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry priceFree; paid from $7 per seat / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentOpen-source agents run on your own nodes; Netdata Cloud is offered as SaaS or on-premises.Managed as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm
Integrations800+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2
SupportCommunity help via Discord, forums and GitHub Discussions, Premium support available, Dedicated support team on on-premises plans, Nedi AI support assistant—
Founded2016—
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesNew York, NY
Employees51–2001,001–5,000
FundingSeries A extension · $33M raisedSeries E · $1100M raised
Best forPlatform engineers, DevOps and SRE teams running Linux, Kubernetes and hybrid infrastructure who want per-second monitoring with zero configuration.—

Plans side by side

Netdata

Community$0free forever, up to 5 nodes
Business$7node/month
Homelab$90year
Cloud On-PremisesCustomcontact sales
Netdata pricing

Tempo

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Netdata

  • real-time, high-granularity infrastructure monitoring
  • strong server monitoring

    Tempo

    • Open-source and cost-effective
    • Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
    • Distributed tracing for traces
    • Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
    • Managed option with a permanent free tier
    • Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Netdata vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/netdata-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.