NetdataReal-time observability with per-second metrics, logs and traces, and AI troubleshooting.
vs
TempoOpen-source, high-scale distributed tracing backend
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Netdata vs Tempo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tempo is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 7.1 versus 1.2 for Netdata, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Netdata if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 6% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- real-time, high-granularity infrastructure monitoring
- strong server monitoring
Choose Tempo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.1 vs 1.2)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Open-source and cost-effective
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Netdata | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 7.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #28 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Netdata 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tempo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
NetdataTempo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Netdata ranked higher
0Tempo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Netdata | Tempo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a free observability platform for small teams? | AI Mode | #6 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Netdata | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Open-source agents run on your own nodes; Netdata Cloud is offered as SaaS or on-premises. | Managed as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm |
| Integrations | 800+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Community help via Discord, forums and GitHub Discussions, Premium support available, Dedicated support team on on-premises plans, Nedi AI support assistant | — |
| Founded | 2016 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | New York, NY |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series A extension · $33M raised | Series E · $1100M raised |
| Best for | Platform engineers, DevOps and SRE teams running Linux, Kubernetes and hybrid infrastructure who want per-second monitoring with zero configuration. | — |
Plans side by side
Netdata
Community$0free forever, up to 5 nodes
Business$7node/month
Homelab$90year
Cloud On-PremisesCustomcontact sales
Tempo
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Netdata
- real-time, high-granularity infrastructure monitoring
- strong server monitoring
Tempo
- Open-source and cost-effective
- Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
- Distributed tracing for traces
- Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
- Managed option with a permanent free tier
- Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Netdata vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/netdata-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.