OneLogin vs Ping Identity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ping Identity is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 22.5 versus 10.1 for OneLogin, and ranks ahead in 56% of the answers that name both.
Choose OneLogin if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
- 30-day free trial and structured evaluation program
- SSO, MFA, provisioning and directory features in one IAM platform
Choose Ping Identity if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.5 vs 10.1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 19% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OneLogin | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.1% | 22.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.3% | down−2.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #10 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 3.1% | 7.5% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 19% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OneLogin +0.09999999999999964pp · Ping Identity −4.699999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ping Identity leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
9 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OneLogin | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Multi-tenant cloud, dedicated-tenant cloud, self-managed on-premises, hybrid, and FedRAMP-authorized environments |
| Integrations | — | 350+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 1, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2009 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Aliso Viejo, California, United States | Denver, CO, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Secondary market | Acquisition by Thoma Bravo (take-private) |
| Best for | Organizations securing workforce, customer and partner access with SSO and MFA | Large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OneLogin
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
- 30-day free trial and structured evaluation program
- SSO, MFA, provisioning and directory features in one IAM platform
- Robust app catalog and developer-friendly provisioning
- Vendor-agnostic, cost-effective alternative to Okta
Ping Identity
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
- Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
- Advanced federation, SSO, and directory services
- Strong customer identity (CIAM) and fraud prevention
- Highly rated by analysts and users
- Enterprise deployments can stretch budgets
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OneLogin vs Ping Identity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/onelogin-vs-ping-identity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.