Skip to content
SlateIndex
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
vs
Ping IdentityIdentity Security for the Digital Enterprise
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Okta vs Ping Identity

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 22.5 for Ping Identity, and ranks ahead in 97% of the answers that name both.

Choose Okta if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 22.5)
  • You need more native integrations (8000+ vs 350+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 36% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage

Choose Ping Identity if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 coverage
  • Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
  • Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Okta Ping Identity
Visibility score56.9%22.5%
Change vs last weekdown−0.9%down−2.2%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#2#4
Share of voice12.2%7.5%
Mentions this run3823
Positive in AI answers39%36%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Okta 57%

Okta −3.3000000000000043pp · Ping Identity −4.699999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
68.4%
25.4%
AI Mode
60%
25.4%
Perplexity
53.9%
19.6%
OktaPing Identity

Head to head in AI answers

35 engine answers name both brands

34Okta ranked higher
1Ping Identity ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOktaPing Identity
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry price$6 per seat / mo—
Free planNo · 30-day trial—
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)Multi-tenant cloud, dedicated-tenant cloud, self-managed on-premises, hybrid, and FedRAMP-authorized environments
Integrations8000+350+
ComplianceISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4SOC 2, ISO 27001
SupportOnline support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans—
Founded20092002
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesDenver, CO, United States
Employees5,000+1,001–5,000
FundingIPOAcquisition by Thoma Bravo (take-private)
Best forOrganizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform.Large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale

Plans side by side

Okta

Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Okta pricing

Ping Identity

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Okta

  • Market-leading IAM platform
  • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
  • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
  • Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
  • Strong security effectiveness

    Ping Identity

    • Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
    • Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
    • Advanced federation, SSO, and directory services
    • Strong customer identity (CIAM) and fraud prevention
    • Highly rated by analysts and users
    • Enterprise deployments can stretch budgets

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Okta vs Ping Identity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/okta-vs-ping-identity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.