Okta vs Ping Identity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 22.5 for Ping Identity, and ranks ahead in 97% of the answers that name both.
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 22.5)
- You need more native integrations (8000+ vs 350+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 36% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
Choose Ping Identity if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
- Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Okta | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 56.9% | 22.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.9% | down−2.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #2 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 12.2% | 7.5% |
| Mentions this run | 38 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 39% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Okta −3.3000000000000043pp · Ping Identity −4.699999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
35 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Okta | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $6 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Multi-tenant cloud, dedicated-tenant cloud, self-managed on-premises, hybrid, and FedRAMP-authorized environments |
| Integrations | 8000+ | 350+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans | — |
| Founded | 2009 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Denver, CO, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | IPO | Acquisition by Thoma Bravo (take-private) |
| Best for | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. | Large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale |
Plans side by side
Okta
Ping Identity
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Ping Identity
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
- Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
- Advanced federation, SSO, and directory services
- Strong customer identity (CIAM) and fraud prevention
- Highly rated by analysts and users
- Enterprise deployments can stretch budgets
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Okta vs Ping Identity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/okta-vs-ping-identity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.