OneLoginIdentity & Access Management
vs
ZITADELIdentity infrastructure, simplified for you.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
OneLogin vs ZITADEL
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OneLogin is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 10.1 versus 1.3 for ZITADEL.
Choose OneLogin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.1 vs 1.3)
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 1 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
Choose ZITADEL if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 19% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OneLogin | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.1% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.3% | up+0.5% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #10 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 3.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 19% | 83% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OneLogin +0.09999999999999964pp · ZITADEL −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OneLogin leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OneLoginZITADEL
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0OneLogin ranked higher
0ZITADEL ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OneLogin | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $100 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud and self-hosted |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 1, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | — | Discord community, GitHub, Documentation, Technical Account Manager (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2009 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Aliso Viejo, California, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Secondary market | Series A · $16M raised |
| Best for | Organizations securing workforce, customer and partner access with SSO and MFA | Developers building applications that need authentication for consumers, businesses or employees, including multi-tenant B2B apps. |
Plans side by side
OneLogin
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OneLogin
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
- 30-day free trial and structured evaluation program
- SSO, MFA, provisioning and directory features in one IAM platform
- Robust app catalog and developer-friendly provisioning
- Vendor-agnostic, cost-effective alternative to Okta
ZITADEL
- Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
- Cloud-native, open-source IAM with strong multi-tenancy and audit logging
- Clear usage limits and published monthly pricing
- Good for developer-focused IAM
- Cloud-based IAM without managing infrastructure
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OneLogin vs ZITADEL”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/onelogin-vs-zitadel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.