OpenAI Agents SDK vs Rasa
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OpenAI Agents SDK is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 31.4 versus 2.4 for Rasa, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose OpenAI Agents SDK if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (31.4 vs 2.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27701:2019 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- Widely adopted platform for enterprise and developer agents
- Streamlined framework for native GPT integration and function calling
Choose Rasa if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OpenAI Agents SDK | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 31.4% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #2 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 5.8% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 38 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 45% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OpenAI Agents SDK 0pp · Rasa 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OpenAI Agents SDK leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | OpenAI Agents SDK | Rasa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | Perplexity | #1 | #17 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OpenAI Agents SDK | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Runs inside the customer's own application; the customer controls deployment, storage and approvals. | Self-managed on-premises or private cloud, or managed service |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, CSA STAR Level 1 | — |
| Support | — | Free community support in the forum, Basic support via online portal with best-effort response during business hours, Premium Support with 24/7/365 response, Customer Success Manager and business reviews |
| Founded | — | 2016 |
| Headquarters | 1455 and 1515 Third Street, San Francisco | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | $122 billion round closed March 31, 2026 at $852 billion post-money, anchored by Amazon, Nvidia and SoftBank · $180000M raised | Series C · $70M raised |
| Best for | Teams already building on OpenAI models that want a lightweight framework to write their own agent logic. | Product teams in regulated enterprises that want engineers and business teams to build customer-facing AI agents on one codebase |
Plans side by side
OpenAI Agents SDK
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OpenAI Agents SDK
- Widely adopted platform for enterprise and developer agents
- Streamlined framework for native GPT integration and function calling
- Good for rapid prototyping
- Access to foundational models and agent workflows via the OpenAI Platform
- A framework rather than a complete enterprise automation suite
- Requires separate payment for OpenAI model API usage
Rasa
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OpenAI Agents SDK vs Rasa”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/openai-agents-sdk-vs-rasa, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.