OpenSearchThe open engine for AI-powered search and observability
vs
RedisReal-time data for agents & apps
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
OpenSearch vs Redis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Redis is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 3.9 for OpenSearch, and ranks ahead in 33% of the answers that name both.
Choose OpenSearch if…
- Strong general database popularity
- Hybrid keyword-plus-semantic search with dense vectors
- Suited to broader search, logging, analytics, and observability
Choose Redis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 3.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or ISO 22301 or ISO 9001 or PCI DSS or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA or CSA STAR or VPAT or FIPS 140-3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | OpenSearch | Redis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.9% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #16 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 3% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 14 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OpenSearch 0pp · Redis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Redis leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OpenSearchRedis
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
2OpenSearch ranked higher
1Redis ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | OpenSearch | Redis |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do companies store and search embeddings without a dedicated tool? | ChatGPT | #4 | #6 |
| How do companies store and search embeddings without a dedicated tool? | AI Mode | #5 | #6 |
| Which Vector Databases vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #8 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OpenSearch | Redis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $0.007 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-managed, or through Amazon OpenSearch Service and managed providers such as Aiven and Instaclustr. A Kubernetes operator is available for managing clusters. | Managed cloud service (Redis Cloud) on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, plus on-premises and hybrid deployment with Redis Software. |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, ISO 22301, ISO 9001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, CSA STAR, VPAT, FIPS 140-3 |
| Support | Community forum, Slack, GitHub, Long-term support from certified providers | Community support on the free plan, Basic support on Essentials plans, Redis support team on paid plans, Knowledge base |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Series D |
| Best for | Organizations that want search, vector retrieval, and observability on open source software without vendor lock-in. | Developers and digital businesses building fast apps and real-time AI agents that need low-latency data access. |
Plans side by side
OpenSearch
Pricing not available.
Redis
Free$0month
Essentials$0.007hour (from; total $5/month)
Pro$0.014hour (from; minimum $200/month)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OpenSearch
- Strong general database popularity
- Hybrid keyword-plus-semantic search with dense vectors
- Suited to broader search, logging, analytics, and observability
Redis
- low-latency vector search alongside caching
- ideal for consolidated enterprise stacks
- fits existing PostgreSQL or MongoDB stacks
- annual plans offer significant savings
- 14-day trial with up to $500 in solution-provider credits
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OpenSearch vs Redis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/opensearch-vs-redis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.