OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
OutSystems vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 1.5 for Tray.ai, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You need more native integrations (700+ vs 400+)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OutSystems | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #32 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OutSystems 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OutSystemsTray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1OutSystems ranked higher
1Tray.ai ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | OutSystems | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do companies build and deploy AI agents that automate work without a dedicated tool? | Perplexity | #1 | #3 |
| Best AI agent platform for enterprise | Perplexity | #14 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OutSystems | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | 400+ | 700+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | — | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2001 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series F, led by KKR | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.