Skip to content
SlateIndex
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
vs
ZendeskAI-powered customer service platform
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

OutSystems vs Zendesk

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Zendesk is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 4.8 versus 2.8 for OutSystems.

Choose OutSystems if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 34% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage

Choose Zendesk if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.8 vs 2.8)
  • You need more native integrations (1800+ vs 400+)
  • You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27018:2019 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 27017:2015 or ISO 42001:2023 or FedRAMP LI-SaaS or Cyber Essentials Plus coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric OutSystems Zendesk
Visibility score2.8%4.8%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#32#25
Share of voice0.8%0.9%
Mentions this run56
Positive in AI answers42%34%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3OutSystems 3%

OutSystems 0pp · Zendesk 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Zendesk leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
5.7%
AI Mode
0%
4.6%
Perplexity
8.5%
4.1%
OutSystemsZendesk

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0OutSystems ranked higher
0Zendesk ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOutSystemsZendesk
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact sales$19 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo
DeploymentCloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plansCloud (SaaS)
Integrations400+1800+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE)SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27018:2019, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 27017:2015, ISO 42001:2023, FedRAMP LI-SaaS, Cyber Essentials Plus
Support—Help Center, Community, Partners
Founded20012007
HeadquartersBoston, Massachusetts, United StatesSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees1,001–5,0005,000+
FundingSeries F, led by KKRTake-private (Hellman & Friedman, Permira)
Best forRegulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trustSupport teams from startups to enterprises that need omnichannel ticketing with AI automation

Plans side by side

OutSystems

OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
OutSystems pricing

Zendesk

Support Team$19agent/month paid yearly
Suite Team$55agent/month paid yearly
Suite Professional$115agent/month paid yearly
Suite Enterprise + CopilotCustomcontact sales
Zendesk pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

OutSystems

  • Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
  • High performance and speed in app delivery
  • Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
  • Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
  • Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
  • Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
  • High cost for enterprise tiers

Zendesk

  • Industry leader in omnichannel customer support
  • Scalable platform for large enterprise teams
  • Mature ticketing operations and SLA management
  • Extensive marketplace and broad integrations
  • Free trial available for 14 days
  • Heavy, slow deployment compared with lighter tools
  • High per-agent costs
  • AI add-ons billed separately on top of base fee

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs Zendesk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-zendesk, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.