Skip to content
SlateIndex
QdrantOpen-Source Vector Search Engine written in Rust
vs
Zilliz CloudThe Vector Lakebase for AI
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2

Qdrant vs Zilliz Cloud

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qdrant is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 60.5 versus 23 for Zilliz Cloud, and ranks ahead in 70% of the answers that name both.

Choose Qdrant if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.5 vs 23)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (68% vs 32% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA coverage

Choose Zilliz Cloud if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or GDPR ready or HIPAA ready coverage
  • built for billion-scale vector workloads
  • free tier with 5 GB storage
  • managed Milvus cloud option

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Qdrant Zilliz Cloud
Visibility score60.5%23%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Vector Databases#2#5
Share of voice13.4%6.3%
Mentions this run6330
Positive in AI answers68%32%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Qdrant 61%

Qdrant 0pp · Zilliz Cloud 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qdrant leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
71.8%
28.7%
AI Mode
59.4%
22%
Perplexity
50.2%
18.3%
QdrantZilliz Cloud

Head to head in AI answers

30 engine answers name both brands

21Qdrant ranked higher
9Zilliz Cloud ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionQdrantZilliz Cloud
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $197 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentManaged cloud, hybrid cloud, private cloud (air-gapped), self-hosted on-premises, and edgeFully managed SaaS, bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) with data in the customer's VPC, and self-run open-source Milvus
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAASOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, GDPR ready, HIPAA ready
SupportCommunity support via Discord on the free tier, Standard tier: email and ticket portal, 10x5 business hours, Premium tier: 24/7 support with private Slack, Discord or Teams channels, Enterprise tier: custom response SLA and advisory servicesCommunity support bot, Email/ticket portal, Slack private channel, Zoom, Google Meet or Teams calls
Founded20212017
HeadquartersBerlin, GermanyRedwood City, California
Employees51–20051–200
FundingSeries B · $88M raisedSeries B extension · $113M raised
Best forDevelopers and teams building RAG, semantic search and recommendation systems that need hybrid search and metadata filtering, either self-hosted or managedTeams running production AI applications that need low-latency vector search at scale, and regulated sectors such as healthcare and finance

Plans side by side

Qdrant

Free Tier$0forever
Standard TierCustomusage-based
Premium TierCustomminimum spend required
Qdrant pricing

Zilliz Cloud

Free$0month
Standard$0month (Serverless, from); from $126/month Dedicated
Enterprise$197month (Dedicated, from)
Business CriticalCustomcontact sales
BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud)Customcontact sales
Zilliz Cloud pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Qdrant

  • High performance and memory efficiency, written in Rust
  • Strong metadata and complex payload filtering
  • Free tier for prototyping and testing
  • Open-source option with flexible self-hosting
  • Strong default choice for startups and production RAG

    Zilliz Cloud

    • built for billion-scale vector workloads
    • free tier with 5 GB storage
    • managed Milvus cloud option
    • transparent pricing with pay-as-you-go options
    • free trial with $100 in credits
    • requires team able to support distributed infrastructure

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qdrant vs Zilliz Cloud”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qdrant-vs-zilliz-cloud, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.