QodoAI code review and governance for teams shipping AI-written code
vs
Sourcegraph CodyThe enterprise coding assistant to understand, fix, and automate your code
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Qodo vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qodo is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 9.4 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.
Choose Qodo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.4 vs 7.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($30 vs $16,000)
- AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 0% positive)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Qodo | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 9.4% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #10 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 15 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qodo 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qodo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QodoSourcegraph Cody
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
4Qodo ranked higher
1Sourcegraph Cody ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Qodo | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #11 | #14 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #8 | #11 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #8 | #11 |
| Which AI coding assistant offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #3 | #5 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #13 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qodo | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | $30 / mo | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Single-tenant SaaS or on-premises | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Standard support: documentation, in-product help and ticket-based response, Priority support, dedicated SLA and assigned team member on Enterprise plans | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, United States | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B · $120M raised | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams shipping code at the speed AI writes it and needing consistent review and governance | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Sourcegraph Cody
Enterprise$16,000year, minimum annual contract (starting at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qodo
- Strong free tooling for code review, test generation, and bug detection inside the IDE
- Exceptional context-aware autocomplete and unit test generation on the free tier
- Automated test generation and pull request review that helps prevent breaking changes
- Offers a free trial, reportedly without a credit card
- Strong choice for review and testing controls in privacy and governance needs
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qodo vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qodo-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.