QodoAI code review and governance for teams shipping AI-written code
vs
ZedThe world's fastest IDE. Open source. AI optional.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Qodo vs Zed
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qodo is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 9.4 versus 1 for Zed, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Qodo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.4 vs 1)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose Zed if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 46% positive)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Qodo | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 9.4% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #10 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 3.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 15 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qodo 0pp · Zed 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qodo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QodoZed
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2Qodo ranked higher
0Zed ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Qodo | Zed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a free AI coding assistant for small teams? | AI Mode | #3 | #4 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | ChatGPT | #15 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qodo | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | $30 / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant SaaS or on-premises | Desktop editor on Windows, macOS and Linux, with remote development over SSH, WSL and dev containers. Users can run local Ollama models, and API keys for hosted providers are kept on the local machine. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Standard support: documentation, in-product help and ticket-based response, Priority support, dedicated SLA and assigned team member on Enterprise plans | — |
| Founded | — | 2021 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, United States | Boulder, Colorado |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B · $120M raised | Series B · $42M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams shipping code at the speed AI writes it and needing consistent review and governance | Developers who want a fast editor with AI optional, and teams that need org-level control over AI features and data sharing through the Business plan. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qodo
- Strong free tooling for code review, test generation, and bug detection inside the IDE
- Exceptional context-aware autocomplete and unit test generation on the free tier
- Automated test generation and pull request review that helps prevent breaking changes
- Offers a free trial, reportedly without a credit card
- Strong choice for review and testing controls in privacy and governance needs
Zed
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
- Heavy usage requires a paid plan upgrade
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qodo vs Zed”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qodo-vs-zed, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.