CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
ZedThe world's fastest IDE. Open source. AI optional.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Cursor vs Zed
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 1 for Zed, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 50% positive)
- You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Zed if…
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cursor | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 67.7% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #2 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 13.6% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 65 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cursor 0pp · Zed 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CursorZed
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2Cursor ranked higher
0Zed ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Cursor | Zed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a free AI coding assistant for small teams? | AI Mode | #2 | #4 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | ChatGPT | #4 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cursor | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents | Desktop editor on Windows, macOS and Linux, with remote development over SSH, WSL and dev containers. Users can run local Ollama models, and API keys for hosted providers are kept on the local machine. |
| Compliance | AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | — | 2021 |
| Headquarters | — | Boulder, Colorado |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Funding round at $9.9B valuation | Series B · $42M raised |
| Best for | Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls. | Developers who want a fast editor with AI optional, and teams that need org-level control over AI features and data sharing through the Business plan. |
Plans side by side
Cursor
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cursor
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
Zed
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
- Heavy usage requires a paid plan upgrade
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Zed”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-zed, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.