Skip to content
SlateIndex
CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
ZedThe world's fastest IDE. Open source. AI optional.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Cursor vs Zed

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 1 for Zed, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Cursor if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 50% positive)
  • You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

Choose Zed if…

  • Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
  • Works with VS Code and JetBrains

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Cursor Zed
Visibility score67.7%1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#2#26
Share of voice13.6%0.4%
Mentions this run652
Positive in AI answers53%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Cursor 68%

Cursor 0pp · Zed 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
78.7%
0.9%
AI Mode
73.5%
2%
Perplexity
50.9%
0%
CursorZed

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

2Cursor ranked higher
0Zed ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCursorZed
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentDesktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agentsDesktop editor on Windows, macOS and Linux, with remote development over SSH, WSL and dev containers. Users can run local Ollama models, and API keys for hosted providers are kept on the local machine.
ComplianceAIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II—
SupportCustomer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan—
Founded—2021
Headquarters—Boulder, Colorado
Employees501–1,00011–50
FundingFunding round at $9.9B valuationSeries B · $42M raised
Best forIndividual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls.Developers who want a fast editor with AI optional, and teams that need org-level control over AI features and data sharing through the Business plan.

Plans side by side

Cursor

Pricing not available.

Zed

Personal$0forever
Pro$10month
Business$30seat, per month
Zed pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Cursor

  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
  • High user satisfaction and momentum
  • Top overall pick for professional developers
  • Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
  • Free tier to try it
  • Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
  • Free Hobby plan has limited usage

Zed

  • Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
  • Works with VS Code and JetBrains
  • Heavy usage requires a paid plan upgrade

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Zed”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-zed, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.