Quantified vs Seismic
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Seismic is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 55.2 versus 1.2 for Quantified, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Quantified if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose Seismic if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.2 vs 1.2)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise content management and document governance at scale
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Quantified | Seismic |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 55.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #31 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 9.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 55 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Quantified 0pp · Seismic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Seismic leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Quantified | Seismic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Sales Enablement platforms | Perplexity | #13 | #2 |
| Which Sales Enablement tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #3 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Quantified | Seismic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on AWS in US East (Ohio) or Europe (Frankfurt), with a logically isolated tenant for each customer | — |
| Integrations | — | 150+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework |
| Support | Team builds personas, scenarios and rubrics alongside the customer's team, Calibration of scoring with the customer's trainers, Hands-on help during rollout and a success team after launch, Email help@quantified.ai | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Series E, led by Lightspeed Venture Partners · $440M raised |
| Best for | Life sciences and regulated commercial teams that must certify reps and keep messaging on-label, such as pharma launch and training teams | Global enterprise sales, marketing and customer-facing teams in financial services, manufacturing, technology and life sciences |
Plans side by side
Quantified
Seismic
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Quantified
Profile in progress.
Seismic
- Enterprise content management and document governance at scale
- Deep analytics and AI-powered revenue execution
- Strong for large enterprises needing content personalization and automation
- Highly rated on G2 and Gartner review data
- Broad enablement platform combining content, training, coaching, and buyer engagement
- Expensive, custom pricing with no transparent or free option
- Heavy and overkill for smaller or early-stage teams
- Long deployment timelines of three to six months
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Quantified vs Seismic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/quantified-vs-seismic, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.