Skip to content
SlateIndex
RedashRedash helps you make sense of your data
vs
YellowfinAnalytics made beautifully simple.
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2

Redash vs Yellowfin

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Yellowfin is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 0.9 versus 0 for Redash.

Choose Redash if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option

Choose Yellowfin if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.9 vs 0)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Redash Yellowfin
Visibility score0%0.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Business Intelligence#46#31
Share of voice0%0.4%
Mentions this run02
Positive in AI answers—0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Redash 0%

Redash 0pp · Yellowfin 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Yellowfin leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
0%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0%
2.6%
RedashYellowfin

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Redash ranked higher
0Yellowfin ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionRedashYellowfin
DeploymentOpen source self-hosted version plus hosted optionsSelf-managed on-premise or in the cloud, or a fully managed hosted service.
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II
SupportCommunity discussions on GitHub—
Founded—2003
Headquarters—Austin, Texas, United States
Employees—51–200
FundingConvertible note · $0M raised—
Best forTeams that want to query many data sources and share dashboards across the companySoftware vendors (ISVs and OEMs) that want to embed white-labelled analytics in their applications, and enterprises that need self-service BI.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Redash vs Yellowfin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/redash-vs-yellowfin, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.