SingleStoreThe real-time database for AI, apps and analytics
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
SingleStore vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 5.7 versus 0.6 for SingleStore.
Choose SingleStore if…
- You want a lower entry price ($0.99 vs $25)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA or Privacy Shield or PCI DSS v4.0.1 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.7 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (18% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | SingleStore | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 5.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #26 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
SingleStore 0pp · Supabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
SingleStoreSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0SingleStore ranked higher
0Supabase ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | SingleStore | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $0.99 / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud service on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, plus self-managed deployments and a bring-your-own-cloud option | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, Privacy Shield, PCI DSS v4.0.1 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Self-support on the free tier, Standard Support on paid tiers, Talk to a specialist, Technical support request | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series F-2 (led by Goldman Sachs) · $558M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Teams building real-time applications, analytics and AI features that need live data without copies | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
SingleStore
Shared$0free workspace
Standard$0.99hour (starts at)
BYOC StandardCustomcontact us
Enterprise$1.49hour (starts at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
SingleStore
Profile in progress.
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “SingleStore vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/singlestore-vs-supabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.