SoftrBuild secure custom portals and internal tools with AI, no code required.
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Softr vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Softr is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.4 versus 3.6 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Softr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.4 vs 3.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (22% vs 18% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR coverage
- Free plan for creating basic business apps
Choose Supabase if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Softr | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.4% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.5% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #19 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 22% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Softr −2.5pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Softr leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
SoftrSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Softr ranked higher
2Supabase ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Softr | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #14 | #12 |
| Best low-code platform for startups | ChatGPT | #11 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Softr | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS built on AWS | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Email (support@softr.io), Community forum, Help docs, Softr Academy | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $16M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Non-technical business teams and departments that need client portals, CRMs, intranets and internal tools without waiting on developers. | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Softr
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Softr
- Free plan for creating basic business apps
- Beginner-friendly, little or no programming experience needed
- Works with Airtable, Google Sheets, or BigQuery as a backend
- Good for data-driven portals and directories
- Suited to simple small-business applications
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Softr vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/softr-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.