Sourcegraph CodyThe enterprise coding assistant to understand, fix, and automate your code
vs
TabbyOpensource, self-hosted AI coding assistant
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabby
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 0.3 for Tabby.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Free trial available for 30 days
Choose Tabby if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- privacy and self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Sourcegraph Cody | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.7% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #12 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 3.3% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 16 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Sourcegraph Cody 0pp · Tabby 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Sourcegraph CodyTabby
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Sourcegraph Cody ranked higher
0Tabby ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Sourcegraph Cody | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $16,000 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments | Self-hosted on-premises or in the cloud, with no external DBMS or cloud services required |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | — |
| Support | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support | Community Slack, Email support, Dedicated Slack channel |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Later-stage deal · $225M raised | Seed · $7M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases | Developers and teams who want a self-hosted, open-source alternative to GitHub Copilot and need to keep control of their code and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Sourcegraph Cody
Enterprise$16,000year, minimum annual contract (starting at)
Tabby
Community$0per month, free open source
Team$19per seat per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Tabby
- privacy and self-hosting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabby”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/sourcegraph-cody-vs-tabby, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.