Sourcegraph CodyThe enterprise coding assistant to understand, fix, and automate your code
vs
VercelThe autonomous stack for every app and agent.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Sourcegraph Cody vs Vercel
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 1.5 for Vercel.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 1.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Vercel if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or PCI DSS or EU-U.S. DPF or HIPAA or TISAX Assessment Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Sourcegraph Cody | Vercel |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.7% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #12 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 3.3% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 16 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Sourcegraph Cody 0pp · Vercel 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Sourcegraph CodyVercel
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Sourcegraph Cody ranked higher
0Vercel ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Sourcegraph Cody | Vercel |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $16,000 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, PCI DSS, EU-U.S. DPF, HIPAA, TISAX Assessment Level 2 |
| Support | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support | Documentation, Knowledge Base, Advanced Support on Enterprise plan, Sales team contact |
| Founded | — | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage deal · $225M raised | Series A-1 · $863M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases | Professional developers, freelancers and businesses building web apps and agents. |
Plans side by side
Sourcegraph Cody
Enterprise$16,000year, minimum annual contract (starting at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Vercel
- Fast, polished frontend UI generation with v0
- Zero extra infrastructure to manage
- Deeply integrated pull request workflows
- Recommended choice for deploying Next.js frontends
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Sourcegraph Cody vs Vercel”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/sourcegraph-cody-vs-vercel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.