Skip to content
SlateIndex
SplunkData Platform for Security, Observability & AI
vs
TempoOpen-source, high-scale distributed tracing backend
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Splunk vs Tempo

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Splunk is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 22.5 versus 7.1 for Tempo, and ranks ahead in 29% of the answers that name both.

Choose Splunk if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.5 vs 7.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (21% vs 6% positive)
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
  • Strong log analytics and security data capabilities at enterprise scale

Choose Tempo if…

  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • Open-source and cost-effective
  • Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
  • Distributed tracing for traces

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Splunk Tempo
Visibility score22.5%7.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#6#12
Share of voice5.8%3.1%
Mentions this run3518
Positive in AI answers21%6%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Splunk 23%

Splunk 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Splunk leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
30.2%
8%
AI Mode
15.4%
11.5%
Perplexity
21.9%
1.9%
SplunkTempo

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

2Splunk ranked higher
5Tempo ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSplunkTempo
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry priceFree; paid from $15 / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentSplunk Cloud Platform as SaaS, or Splunk Enterprise in a private cloud or on-premises, including air-gapped environmentsManaged as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm
Integrations2000+—
Compliance—SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2
SupportStandard support included with product purchases, Premium support available, Support Portal for capacity changes—
Founded2003—
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, USNew York, NY
Employees5,000+1,001–5,000
FundingIPOSeries E · $1100M raised
Best forSecOps, ITOps and engineering teams that run large volumes of machine data and need security and observability in one platform—

Plans side by side

Splunk

Infrastructure$15host/month billed annually
App & Infra$60host/month billed annually
End-to-End$75host/month billed annually
Splunk pricing

Tempo

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Splunk

  • Strong log analytics and security data capabilities at enterprise scale
  • Real-time infrastructure monitoring and application performance monitoring
  • Free edition and trial available
  • Incident alerting integration that routes and auto-resolves incidents
  • Good fit for existing Splunk customers
  • Complex, opaque, hard-to-predict pricing with surprise overage fees

Tempo

  • Open-source and cost-effective
  • Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
  • Distributed tracing for traces
  • Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
  • Managed option with a permanent free tier
  • Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Splunk vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/splunk-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.