Stack AIAI Agents for the Enterprise
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Stack AI vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 1.4 for Stack AI.
Choose Stack AI if…
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- hosted no-code agent builders
- free tiers for experimenting
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 1.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Stack AI | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #51 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Stack AI 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Stack AIUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Stack AI ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Stack AI | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Multi-tenant cloud, VPC, or on-premise | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Integrations | 500+ | — |
| Compliance | HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Community support on Discord, Email support, Priority support, Dedicated support | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2023 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series A · $19M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | IT teams and enterprise architecture teams that need to orchestrate, deploy, govern, and scale AI across the enterprise, including finance, risk and operations teams. | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Stack AI
- hosted no-code agent builders
- free tiers for experimenting
- solid G2 and Slashdot ratings
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Stack AI vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/stack-ai-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.