Sumo Logic vs Tempo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tempo is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 7.1 versus 1.8 for Sumo Logic, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Sumo Logic if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (20% vs 6% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate Authorized or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS 4.0.1 or CCPA coverage
Choose Tempo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.1 vs 1.8)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Sumo Logic | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.8% | 7.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #25 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 20% | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Sumo Logic 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tempo leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Sumo Logic | Tempo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading observability platforms | Perplexity | #14 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Sumo Logic | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | SaaS | Managed as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm |
| Integrations | 450+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Moderate Authorized, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS 4.0.1, CCPA | SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Standard support (8x5), Enterprise support (P1 24/7), Premium support with a named Technical Account Manager | — |
| Founded | 2010 | — |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California | New York, NY |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | IPO (NASDAQ: SUMO) | Series E · $1100M raised |
| Best for | Small-to-medium DevOps and SecOps teams (Essentials) and maturing security teams (Enterprise Suite) | — |
Plans side by side
Tempo
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Sumo Logic
Profile in progress.
Tempo
- Open-source and cost-effective
- Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
- Distributed tracing for traces
- Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
- Managed option with a permanent free tier
- Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Sumo Logic vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/sumo-logic-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.