SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
vs
turbopufferVector and full-text search built on object storage
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2
Supabase vs turbopuffer
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 5.7 versus 4.6 for turbopuffer, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.7 vs 4.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
Choose turbopuffer if…
- You want a lower entry price ($16 vs $25)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 18% positive)
- You need HIPAA (Business Associate Agreement available) or GDPR-ready DPA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Supabase | turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.7% | 4.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #12 | #14 |
| Share of voice | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 18% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Supabase 0pp · turbopuffer 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Supabaseturbopuffer
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Supabase ranked higher
0turbopuffer ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Supabase | turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top vector database vendors | Perplexity | #11 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Supabase | turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | $16 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source | Multi-tenant cloud on usage-based plans; single-tenant and bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) deployments on the enterprise plan. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (Business Associate Agreement available), GDPR-ready DPA |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) | Community Slack and email on all plans, Private Slack channel on higher plans, 24/7 support and 99.95% uptime SLA on enterprise |
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Remote-first, United States | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series D · $1000M raised | Seed |
| Best for | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend | Teams building AI applications, semantic search or recommendation systems that need large-scale vector and full-text search at lower cost. |
Plans side by side
turbopuffer
launch$16month minimum usage
scale$256month minimum usage
enterprise$4,096month minimum usage (>= $4,096/month, 35% usage premium)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
turbopuffer
- serverless vector and full-text search built on object storage
- high performance at a fraction of traditional costs
- cloud-native, cost-conscious design
- ranked among highest vendors in an industry ranking
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Supabase vs turbopuffer”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/supabase-vs-turbopuffer, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.