SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Supabase vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 2.4 for UiPath.
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 2.4)
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
Choose UiPath if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 18% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Supabase | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #27 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 18% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Supabase +3.6pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
SupabaseUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Supabase ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Supabase | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2020 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Remote-first, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series D · $1000M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Supabase vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/supabase-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.