ToolJetAI app builder for internal tools
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
ToolJet vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 1.5 for ToolJet.
Choose ToolJet if…
- You want a lower entry price ($23 vs $25)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 1.5)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ToolJet | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #39 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ToolJet +1.5pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ToolJetUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ToolJet ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ToolJet | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $23 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | ToolJet Cloud or self-hosted on the customer's own infrastructure | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Integrations | 91+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Community support via Slack, Email, Priority email support, Dedicated support manager | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2021 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Undisclosed round with M12 participation · $6M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Teams building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards and approval apps over their own data | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
ToolJet
Free$0per builder/month
Basic$23per builder/month
Flexible Pro$79per builder/month
Team$199per builder/month
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ToolJet
Profile in progress.
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ToolJet vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/tooljet-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.