Skip to content
SlateIndex
Wiki.jsNext Generation Open Source Wiki
vs
XWikiThe Advanced Open-Source Enterprise Wiki
Comparison · Knowledge Management · weekly run Nov 3

Wiki.js vs XWiki

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Wiki.js is the stronger AI pick in Knowledge Management: it has a visibility score of 0.3 versus 0.3 for XWiki.

Choose Wiki.js if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

Choose XWiki if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Wiki.js XWiki
Visibility score0.3%0.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Knowledge Management#46#48
Share of voice0.2%0.2%
Mentions this run11
Positive in AI answers0%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Wiki.js 0%

Wiki.js 0pp · XWiki 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Wiki.js leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
0.9%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0.9%
0%
Wiki.jsXWiki

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Wiki.js ranked higher
0XWiki ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionWiki.jsXWiki
DeploymentSelf-hosted, on Docker, Kubernetes or any platform that runs Node.js and PostgresSelf-hosted or on-premise, plus a managed cloud service (XWiki Cloud) and Docker images.
Support—Community support, Professional support
Founded20172004
Headquarters—Paris, France
Employees—51–200
Funding—NGI funding (European Commission) for the WAISE project · $0M raised
Best forIndividuals and teams that want a self-hosted, free wiki they fully control, from small side projects to wikis with thousands of contributorsOrganisations that need a knowledge base, collaborative intranet, public website or business applications built inside a wiki.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Wiki.js vs XWiki”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/wiki-js-vs-xwiki, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.