Gumloop alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Gumloop
n8nBest forTechnical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code.80% of Gumloop answersMicrosoft Copilot Studio70% of Gumloop answersLangGraphBest forTeams building long-running, stateful AI agents.70% of Gumloop answersMakeBest forTeams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide.70% of Gumloop answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Gumloop has a visibility score of 4.9 in AI Agents, #24 of 80. AI answers that name Gumloop most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n8n | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. | — | 22% | Combines AI capabilities with business process automation in one workflow platform. |
| Microsoft Copilot Studio | — | — | 33.3% | — |
| LangGraph | Teams building long-running, stateful AI agents. | — | 24.4% | — |
| Make | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | — | 14.4% | Glass box visibility: every automation and AI agent can be watched as it runs in one live view, with governance controls. |
Alternative 1
n8n vs Gumloop →n8n
n8n suits technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 22% visibility score · #5 in AI Agents
- 2000+ native integrations
Key features
- n8n — Workflow automation platform with a visual builder, AI agents, MCP support and code steps in JavaScript or Python.
- n8n Community Edition — Standard self-hosted version of n8n, available on GitHub.
n8n vs Gumloop
| Dimension | n8n | Gumloop |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22% | 4.9% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $37 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | 14-day free trial |
Pros
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
Cons
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Microsoft Copilot Studio is ranked #1 in AI Agents.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 33.3% visibility score · #1 in AI Agents
Key features
- Copilot Studio — Low-code platform for building and managing custom AI agents.
- Computer-using agents — Agents that operate computer interfaces, generally available from May 2026.
- Workflows designer — Redesigned experience for building agent workflows.
- Real-time voice agents — Voice agent experience with real-time conversation.
Microsoft Copilot Studio vs Gumloop
| Dimension | Microsoft Copilot Studio | Gumloop |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 33.3% | 4.9% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $37 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | 14-day free trial |
Pros
- Strong fit for organisations standardised on Microsoft 365, Azure, Teams and Dynamics
- Extensive enterprise integration, scale and governance
- Widely adopted for enterprise customisation
- Pre-built connectors to Slack, Teams, Salesforce and other SaaS tools
- Recommended as a leading enterprise AI agent platform
Cons
- Reviews skew toward IT and admin utility
Alternative 3
LangGraph vs Gumloop →LangGraph
LangGraph suits teams building long-running, stateful AI agents..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 24.4% visibility score · #4 in AI Agents
Key features
- LangGraph — Low-level orchestration framework and runtime for building, managing and deploying long-running, stateful agents.
- Deep Agents — Agent harness built on top of LangGraph.
- LangSmith Deployment — Managed deployment service for LangGraph agents, with paid tiers.
LangGraph vs Gumloop
| Dimension | LangGraph | Gumloop |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 24.4% | 4.9% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $37 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | 14-day free trial |
Pros
- Production standard for stateful, multi-agent workflows
- Strong engineering control for complex, cyclical agent logic
- Widely adopted open-source developer framework
- Best choice for autonomous AI agents
Cons
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding effort
Alternative 4
Make vs Gumloop →Make
Make suits teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 14.4% visibility score · #7 in Knowledge Management
- 3500+ native integrations
Key features
- Make AI Agents — Autonomous agents that are given a goal and tools, work out the steps themselves, and show their reasoning.
- Make AI Workflows — Guided workflows where you set the path and AI handles specific judgement calls.
- Make Automated Workflows — Fully controlled workflows where every step is defined and every run is predictable.
- Make MCP Server — Build and run Make automations from Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini.
Make vs Gumloop
| Dimension | Make | Gumloop |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.4% | 4.9% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $37 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | 14-day free trial |
Pros
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Cons
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Gumloop | Flat tiers | $37 / mo |
| n8n | — | — |
| Microsoft Copilot Studio | — | — |
| LangGraph | — | — |
| Make | — | — |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Gumloop in the latest weekly run.