ActivepiecesAI agents, flows and 770+ apps in one workspace, open source at the core
vs
IterableAI Customer Engagement Platform for Real-Time, Personalized Experiences
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Activepieces vs Iterable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Iterable is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 0 for Activepieces.
Choose Activepieces if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
Choose Iterable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or Data Privacy Framework or Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules or Global Privacy Rules for Processors coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Good fit for growth-stage, retail, and media organizations running cross-channel campaigns
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Activepieces | Iterable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #40 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Activepieces 0pp · Iterable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Iterable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ActivepiecesIterable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Activepieces ranked higher
0Iterable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Activepieces | Iterable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Vendor cloud (EU, Frankfurt by default), self-hosted on your own servers, or fully air-gapped | — |
| Integrations | 770+ | — |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, Data Privacy Framework, Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules, Global Privacy Rules for Processors |
| Support | Community, AI support, Email on Team plan, Dedicated support on Ultimate plan | Community and expert-led programs |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 11–50 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Series E · $342M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want AI agents and automations across their business apps, with IT running the deployment and staff building the workflows | Global brands that want marketers to run real-time, cross-channel engagement without engineering dependency. |
Plans side by side
Iterable
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Activepieces
Profile in progress.
Iterable
- Good fit for growth-stage, retail, and media organizations running cross-channel campaigns
- Suited to high-growth, mobile-heavy consumer startups needing real-time multi-channel engagement
- Strong for product-led growth and behavioral, real-time cross-channel messaging
- Named among leading analyst-backed marketing automation shortlists
- Good choice for high-scale consumer engagement
- Pricing not transparent; generally requires custom quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Activepieces vs Iterable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activepieces-vs-iterable, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.