Agiloft vs Conga CLM
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Conga CLM is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 7.3 versus 3.4 for Agiloft, and ranks ahead in 40% of the answers that name both.
Choose Agiloft if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 coverage
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
- Strong fit for mid-market and enterprise complex approval, compliance, and renewal needs
Choose Conga CLM if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.3 vs 3.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 36% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Agiloft | Conga CLM |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.4% | 7.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #22 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 67% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agiloft 0pp · Conga CLM 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Conga CLM leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Agiloft | Conga CLM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #9 | #10 |
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #8 | #10 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #10 | #13 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | AI Mode | #6 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agiloft | Conga CLM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Hosted service on AWS, with redundant infrastructure inside or outside the USA | Flexible deployment options |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, HIPAA, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework |
| Support | Professional Services and Training, Technical Support, Customer Success, Agiloft University | — |
| Founded | 1991 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California, US | Houston, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Strategic investment, KKR | Venture round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures |
| Best for | Enterprise legal, procurement and sales teams that need to tailor contract workflows without code | Large enterprises and high-growth businesses whose commercial complexity across sales, legal, finance and IT is high. |
Plans side by side
Conga CLM
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agiloft
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
- Strong fit for mid-market and enterprise complex approval, compliance, and renewal needs
Conga CLM
- Enterprise-grade document generation, CPQ, and contract lifecycle management
- Deep integration with CRM ecosystems and Salesforce
- Suited to complex sales cycles and complex, multi-layered agreement workflows
- Stronger choice for broader contract and agreement management
- Proposal generation integrated with broader CRM and document workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agiloft vs Conga CLM”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agiloft-vs-conga-clm, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.