AgnoThe agent platform that builds itself
vs
AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Agno vs Appian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appian is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 0.3 versus 0 for Agno.
Choose Agno if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 38% positive)
- free open-source runtime
- no per-event, token, or compute charges
Choose Appian if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.3 vs 0)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Agno | Appian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #73 | #71 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.1% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agno 0pp · Appian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appian leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AgnoAppian
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Agno ranked higher
0Appian ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agno | Appian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $150 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted in your own cloud, on-premise or locally, as a container | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization |
| Support | Community and forums, Email support, Slack Connect and service SLA (Enterprise) | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less |
| Founded | — | 1999 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | McLean, Virginia |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised |
| Best for | Teams building and running agents in their own cloud, from solo builders to Fortune 5 companies | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context |
Plans side by side
Appian
Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agno
- free open-source runtime
- no per-event, token, or compute charges
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agno vs Appian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agno-vs-appian, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.