AirtableAI-Native App Platform
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Airtable vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Airtable is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 10.9 versus 2.4 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Airtable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.9 vs 2.4)
- You want a lower entry price ($20 vs $25)
- You need ISO/IEC 27701 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose UiPath if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 24% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Airtable | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.9% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #10 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 3.2% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 18 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 24% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Airtable −1.5pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Airtable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AirtableUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Airtable ranked higher
1UiPath ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Airtable | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #14 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Airtable | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, with US and EU hosting options | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, TX-RAMP Level 2 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | — | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | — | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series F · $1350M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Teams and enterprises that need to build governed, AI-enabled business apps and workflows without writing code. | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Airtable
Free$0user/month
Team$20user/month, billed annually
Business$45user/month, billed annually
Enterprise ScaleCustomcustom
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Airtable
- User-friendly spreadsheet-database hybrid for no-code work
- Collaborative operational data and lightweight workflows
- Customizable workflows for project management
- Connects well with many data sources
- Annual billing lowers per-seat cost
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Airtable vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/airtable-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.