Skip to content
SlateIndex
AmazingHiringHire Hidden Tech Talent 50% Faster
vs
GoodTimeSmarter Interview Scheduling, Better Experiences
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

AmazingHiring vs GoodTime

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

AmazingHiring is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 0.3 versus 0 for GoodTime.

Choose AmazingHiring if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.3 vs 0)

Choose GoodTime if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000) or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 42001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric AmazingHiring GoodTime
Visibility score0.3%0%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#66#76
Share of voice0.2%0%
Mentions this run10
Positive in AI answers0%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3AmazingHiring 0%

AmazingHiring 0pp · GoodTime 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

AmazingHiring leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
0%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0%
0%
AmazingHiringGoodTime

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0AmazingHiring ranked higher
0GoodTime ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAmazingHiringGoodTime
DeploymentWeb, Android and iPhone/iPad—
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000), SOC 3, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR, CCPA
Support—Customer Help Center
Founded20132016
HeadquartersRedwood City, CaliforniaSan Francisco, California, US
Employees11–5051–200
FundingAngelSeed (seed/angel)
Best forTech recruiters and talent acquisition teams filling hard-to-hire technical rolesEnterprise talent teams that run complex panel, multi-day and high-volume interview scheduling.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “AmazingHiring vs GoodTime”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amazinghiring-vs-goodtime, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.