AmazingHiringHire Hidden Tech Talent 50% Faster
vs
OpenCATSFree, open-source applicant tracking that stays in your hands
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
AmazingHiring vs OpenCATS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OpenCATS is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 0.6 versus 0.3 for AmazingHiring.
Choose AmazingHiring if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose OpenCATS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.6 vs 0.3)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AmazingHiring | OpenCATS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #66 | #61 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AmazingHiring 0pp · OpenCATS 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OpenCATS leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AmazingHiringOpenCATS
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AmazingHiring ranked higher
0OpenCATS ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AmazingHiring | OpenCATS |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Web, Android and iPhone/iPad | Self-hosted |
| Support | — | Community forum, Subreddit for peer-to-peer user support, Public installation documentation |
| Founded | 2013 | — |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California | — |
| Employees | 11–50 | — |
| Funding | Angel | — |
| Best for | Tech recruiters and talent acquisition teams filling hard-to-hire technical roles | Staffing agencies, internal recruiting teams and hiring workflows that want self-hosted control of their recruiting data |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AmazingHiring vs OpenCATS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amazinghiring-vs-opencats, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.