Appfarm vs Appsmith
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 4.6 for Appfarm, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appfarm if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 4.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Open-source and free to self-host
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appfarm | Appsmith |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 17.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.7% | up+1.9% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #23 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 4.2% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 48% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appfarm −0.8000000000000007pp · Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appfarm | Appsmith |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | AI Mode | #5 | #3 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #18 | #15 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #7 | #1 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #8 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appfarm | Appsmith |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Community, Email, Service manager | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Oslo, Norway | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Capital increase led by Idékapital, with Eviny Ventures and Arkwright X · $6M raised | Series B · $52M raised |
| Best for | Operations teams that need governed operational apps without a dedicated development team | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels |
Plans side by side
Appfarm
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appfarm
- Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appfarm vs Appsmith”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appfarm-vs-appsmith, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.