Appfarm vs Bubble
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Bubble is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 23 versus 4.6 for Appfarm, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appfarm if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes
Choose Bubble if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (23 vs 4.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR support coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appfarm | Bubble |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 23% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.7% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #23 | #5 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 5.3% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 32 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appfarm −0.8000000000000007pp · Bubble 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Bubble leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appfarm | Bubble |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #18 | #1 |
| Top low-code platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #12 | #2 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | Perplexity | #17 | #7 |
| Best low-code platform with AI features | Perplexity | #13 | #6 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #8 | #4 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #16 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appfarm | Bubble |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $32 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud | Bubble-hosted cloud platform; enterprise customers can get a dedicated instance on AWS with a choice of region |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR support |
| Support | Community, Email, Service manager | Community forum, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Oslo, Norway | New York, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Capital increase led by Idékapital, with Eviny Ventures and Arkwright X · $6M raised | Series A · $106M raised |
| Best for | Operations teams that need governed operational apps without a dedicated development team | Founders, startups and teams that want to build and launch web and mobile apps without writing code |
Plans side by side
Appfarm
Pricing not available.
Bubble
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appfarm
- Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes
Bubble
- Powerful visual full-stack web app builder
- Best for customer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs
- Free tier useful for learning and prototyping
- Annual billing saves up to 20%
- Fast MVP speed and workflow flexibility
- Free tier limited to development and testing; live publishing and custom domains need a paid plan
- Less suited to heavily governed enterprise systems
- Less portability and deep architectural control
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appfarm vs Bubble”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appfarm-vs-bubble, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.