Skip to content
SlateIndex
BubbleVisual no-code builder for web and mobile apps, with AI
vs
Microsoft Power AppsLow-code AI app builder for custom business apps
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Bubble vs Microsoft Power Apps

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 23 for Bubble, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.

Choose Bubble if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR support coverage
  • Powerful visual full-stack web app builder
  • Best for customer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs
  • Free tier useful for learning and prototyping

Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 23)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 36% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Most widely used low-code platform by adoption

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Bubble Microsoft Power Apps
Visibility score23%55.6%
Change vs last weekup+0.1%up+0.2%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#5#1
Share of voice5.3%9.8%
Mentions this run3255
Positive in AI answers36%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Bubble 23%

Bubble 0pp · Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
25.9%
60.7%
AI Mode
15.6%
57%
Perplexity
27.6%
48.9%
BubbleMicrosoft Power Apps

Head to head in AI answers

24 engine answers name both brands

8Bubble ranked higher
16Microsoft Power Apps ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionBubbleMicrosoft Power Apps
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry priceFree; paid from $32 / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentBubble-hosted cloud platform; enterprise customers can get a dedicated instance on AWS with a choice of regionMicrosoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR supportSOC 2 Type 2
SupportCommunity forum, Dedicated support team on Enterprise planDocumentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community
Founded2012—
HeadquartersNew York, NY, United StatesRedmond, Washington
Employees501–1,000—
FundingSeries A · $106M raised—
Best forFounders, startups and teams that want to build and launch web and mobile apps without writing codeOrganizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together

Plans side by side

Bubble

Free$0month
Starter$32month, billed annually
Growth$119month, billed annually
Team$349month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact us
Bubble pricing

Microsoft Power Apps

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Bubble

  • Powerful visual full-stack web app builder
  • Best for customer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs
  • Free tier useful for learning and prototyping
  • Annual billing saves up to 20%
  • Fast MVP speed and workflow flexibility
  • Free tier limited to development and testing; live publishing and custom domains need a paid plan
  • Less suited to heavily governed enterprise systems
  • Less portability and deep architectural control

Microsoft Power Apps

  • Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
  • Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
  • Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
  • Transparent, publicly listed pricing
  • Free developer plan and trial for testing
  • Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
  • Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bubble vs Microsoft Power Apps”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bubble-vs-microsoft-power-apps, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.