AppfarmBuild custom software without becoming a software company.
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Appfarm vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.3 versus 4.6 for Appfarm, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appfarm if…
- Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.3 vs 4.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appfarm | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 6.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.7% | down−7.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #23 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appfarm −0.8000000000000007pp · Make −7.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppfarmMake
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0Appfarm ranked higher
3Make ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Appfarm | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #18 | #13 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | Perplexity | #17 | #16 |
| Best low-code platform with AI features | Perplexity | #13 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appfarm | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Managed cloud | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community, Email, Service manager | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Oslo, Norway | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Capital increase led by Idékapital, with Eviny Ventures and Arkwright X · $6M raised | — |
| Best for | Operations teams that need governed operational apps without a dedicated development team | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appfarm
- Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appfarm vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appfarm-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.