Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
AppSheetBuild apps with no code
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Appian vs AppSheet

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Appian is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 19.6 versus 6.7 for AppSheet, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Appian if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.6 vs 6.7)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 26% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
  • heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration

Choose AppSheet if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
  • Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
  • Affordable low-code option
  • Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appian AppSheet
Visibility score19.6%6.7%
Change vs last weekdown−1%up+1.5%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#6#14
Share of voice5.4%1.9%
Mentions this run3111
Positive in AI answers38%26%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Appian 20%

Appian −1pp · AppSheet +1.5pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Appian leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
21.9%
4.1%
AI Mode
20.2%
6.3%
Perplexity
16.9%
9.6%
AppianAppSheet

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

6Appian ranked higher
0AppSheet ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppianAppSheet
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $5 per seat / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentAppian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid optionsCloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform
ComplianceSOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorizationSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018
SupportAppian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or lessAppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan)
Founded1999—
HeadquartersMcLean, Virginia—
Employees1,001–5,000—
FundingIPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raisedSeries A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates
Best forLarge enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational contextBusinesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace.

Plans side by side

Appian

Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Appian pricing

AppSheet

Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
AppSheet pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Appian

  • heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
  • strong case management
  • suited to regulated industries
  • governed platform for AI agents
  • free Community Edition for evaluation
  • quote-based, less transparent pricing

AppSheet

  • Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
  • Affordable low-code option
  • Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
  • Suits organisations on Google Workspace
  • Connects apps to existing business systems
  • Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs AppSheet”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-appsheet, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.