Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
GleanEnterprise AI that understands your company
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

Appian vs Glean

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Glean is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 0.9 versus 0.3 for Appian.

Choose Appian if…

  • You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
  • strong case management

Choose Glean if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.9 vs 0.3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 38% positive)
  • You need ISO 42001 or TX-RAMP Level 2 or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR coverage
  • Enterprise search across many connected apps

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appian Glean
Visibility score0.3%0.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#71#63
Share of voice0.1%0.4%
Mentions this run13
Positive in AI answers38%56%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Appian 0%

Appian 0pp · Glean 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Glean leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
2.8%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0.9%
0%
AppianGlean

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Appian ranked higher
0Glean ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppianGlean
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planYes—
DeploymentAppian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid optionsPer-customer search model stored in the customer's VPC
Integrations—250+
ComplianceSOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorizationISO 42001, HIPAA, TX-RAMP Level 2, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR
SupportAppian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or lessHelp Center
Founded19992019
HeadquartersMcLean, VirginiaSan Francisco, CA
Employees1,001–5,000501–1,000
FundingIPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raisedSeed or early-stage round (emerged from stealth) · $765M raised
Best forLarge enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational contextLarge enterprises that want AI answers and agents grounded in their own permission-aware company data

Plans side by side

Appian

Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Appian pricing

Glean

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Appian

  • heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
  • strong case management
  • suited to regulated industries
  • governed platform for AI agents
  • free Community Edition for evaluation
  • quote-based, less transparent pricing

Glean

  • Enterprise search across many connected apps
  • Seen as a market leader in enterprise search
  • Finds answers and internal experts quickly
  • Recommended for enterprise-wide knowledge search

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Glean”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-glean, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.