AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
GleanEnterprise AI that understands your company
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Appian vs Glean
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glean is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 0.9 versus 0.3 for Appian.
Choose Appian if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
Choose Glean if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.9 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 38% positive)
- You need ISO 42001 or TX-RAMP Level 2 or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR coverage
- Enterprise search across many connected apps
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 0.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #71 | #63 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian 0pp · Glean 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glean leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppianGlean
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Appian ranked higher
0Glean ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | Per-customer search model stored in the customer's VPC |
| Integrations | — | 250+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | ISO 42001, HIPAA, TX-RAMP Level 2, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | Help Center |
| Founded | 1999 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Seed or early-stage round (emerged from stealth) · $765M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Large enterprises that want AI answers and agents grounded in their own permission-aware company data |
Plans side by side
Appian
Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Glean
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
Glean
- Enterprise search across many connected apps
- Seen as a market leader in enterprise search
- Finds answers and internal experts quickly
- Recommended for enterprise-wide knowledge search
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Glean”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-glean, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.