Appian vs Kissflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appian is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 19.6 versus 7.7 for Kissflow, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appian if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.6 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 17% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Kissflow if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
- unified enterprise process automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | Kissflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.6% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | down−1% | down−5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #6 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 31 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian −1pp · Kissflow −4.999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appian leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appian | Kissflow |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | AI Mode | #2 | #8 |
| Best low-code platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #6 | #9 |
| How much does a low-code platform cost per month? | AI Mode | #6 | #7 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #7 | #9 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #4 | #13 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | AI Mode | #4 | #5 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #4 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | Kissflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | Public and private cloud hosting |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | Dedicated support throughout transformation, Training and enablement for teams, Hands-on implementation |
| Founded | 1999 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | Wilmington, Delaware, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Angel · $1M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Large enterprises and IT teams that build and govern custom internal apps on one platform. |
Plans side by side
Appian
Kissflow
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
Kissflow
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
- unified enterprise process automation
- ease-of-use with structured workflow governance
- highly rated by business technologists and process owners
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Kissflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-kissflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.