AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
OneReach.aiAgentic Orchestration Platform for the Enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Appian vs OneReach.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OneReach.ai is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0.3 for Appian.
Choose Appian if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
Choose OneReach.ai if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or UK Cyber Essentials or HITRUST coverage
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #71 | #58 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian 0pp · OneReach.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OneReach.ai leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppianOneReach.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Appian ranked higher
0OneReach.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | Dedicated Private Environment hosted in the customer's cloud or managed by OneReach, on public, private, government or sovereign infrastructure. |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | SOC 2 Type II, UK Cyber Essentials, HITRUST |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | 24/7 support is standard across managed, infrastructure-only and combined service models |
| Founded | 1999 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | Denver, CO |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Private equity round led by LoneTree Capital (listed as Growth Equity by Caplight) |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Large enterprises, especially in regulated industries such as government, finance and healthcare, that need many AI agents governed, costed and reused under central IT control. |
Plans side by side
Appian
Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
OneReach.ai
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
OneReach.ai
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs OneReach.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-onereach-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.