AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
Relevance AISpecialist AI Agents for Every Task
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Appian vs Relevance AI
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Relevance AI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 8 versus 0.3 for Appian.
Choose Appian if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Relevance AI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 38% positive)
- You need GDPR coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #71 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 1.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian 0pp · Relevance AI 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Relevance AI leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppianRelevance AI
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Appian ranked higher
0Relevance AI ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | — |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | Embedded deployment team, Dedicated account manager on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 1999 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Series A (unconfirmed, reported by Signalbase) · $37M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Enterprise teams in sales, customer success, marketing and HR that want non-technical staff to build and run their own agents. |
Plans side by side
Appian
Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
Relevance AI
- visual drag-and-drop agent builder
- free tier
- prebuilt agent templates for sales, support, and operations
- hosted no-code agent builder useful for experimenting
- named best overall
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Relevance AI”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-relevance-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.