AppSheet vs Appsmith
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 6.7 for AppSheet, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose AppSheet if…
- You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $15)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 6.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 26% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Open-source and free to self-host
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AppSheet | Appsmith |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 17.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.5% | up+1.9% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #14 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 4.2% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | 48% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AppSheet +1.5pp · Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | AppSheet | Appsmith |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do companies build internal apps without a full engineering team without a dedicated tool? | AI Mode | #3 | #2 |
| Most affordable low-code platform that is still reliable | ChatGPT | #2 | #3 |
| Most affordable low-code platform that is still reliable | AI Mode | #4 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AppSheet | Appsmith |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise |
| Founded | — | 2019 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates | Series B · $52M raised |
| Best for | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels |
Plans side by side
AppSheet
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Appsmith”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-appsmith, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.