Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppSheetBuild apps with no code
vs
BubbleVisual no-code builder for web and mobile apps, with AI
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

AppSheet vs Bubble

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Bubble is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 23 versus 6.7 for AppSheet, and ranks ahead in 63% of the answers that name both.

Choose AppSheet if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $32)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or GDPR or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
  • Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps

Choose Bubble if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (23 vs 6.7)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 26% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR support coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric AppSheet Bubble
Visibility score6.7%23%
Change vs last weekup+1.5%up+0.1%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#14#5
Share of voice1.9%5.3%
Mentions this run1132
Positive in AI answers26%36%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3AppSheet 7%

AppSheet +1.5pp · Bubble 0pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Bubble leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
4.1%
25.9%
AI Mode
6.3%
15.6%
Perplexity
9.6%
27.6%
AppSheetBubble

Head to head in AI answers

8 engine answers name both brands

3AppSheet ranked higher
5Bubble ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppSheetBubble
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $5 per seat / moFree; paid from $32 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud, browser-based on Google Cloud PlatformBubble-hosted cloud platform; enterprise customers can get a dedicated instance on AWS with a choice of region
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018SOC 2 Type II, GDPR support
SupportAppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan)Community forum, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plan
Founded—2012
Headquarters—New York, NY, United States
Employees—501–1,000
FundingSeries A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise AssociatesSeries A · $106M raised
Best forBusinesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace.Founders, startups and teams that want to build and launch web and mobile apps without writing code

Plans side by side

AppSheet

Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
AppSheet pricing

Bubble

Free$0month
Starter$32month, billed annually
Growth$119month, billed annually
Team$349month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact us
Bubble pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

AppSheet

  • Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
  • Affordable low-code option
  • Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
  • Suits organisations on Google Workspace
  • Connects apps to existing business systems
  • Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows

Bubble

  • Powerful visual full-stack web app builder
  • Best for customer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs
  • Free tier useful for learning and prototyping
  • Annual billing saves up to 20%
  • Fast MVP speed and workflow flexibility
  • Free tier limited to development and testing; live publishing and custom domains need a paid plan
  • Less suited to heavily governed enterprise systems
  • Less portability and deep architectural control

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Bubble”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-bubble, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.