AppSheetBuild apps with no code
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
AppSheet vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AppSheet is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 6.3 for Make, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose AppSheet if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 6.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
Choose Make if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 26% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AppSheet | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 6.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.5% | down−7.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #14 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AppSheet +1.5pp · Make −7.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AppSheet leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppSheetMake
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
3AppSheet ranked higher
0Make ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | AppSheet | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do companies build internal apps without a full engineering team without a dedicated tool? | AI Mode | #3 | #7 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | Perplexity | #10 | #16 |
| Best low-code platform with AI features | Perplexity | #7 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AppSheet | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates | — |
| Best for | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
AppSheet
Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.