Appsmith vs Kissflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 7.7 for Kissflow, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Open-source and free to self-host
Choose Kissflow if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appsmith | Kissflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.6% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.9% | down−5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #7 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp · Kissflow −4.999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appsmith | Kissflow |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | AI Mode | #6 | #8 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #1 | #6 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #3 | #9 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #16 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appsmith | Kissflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on | Public and private cloud hosting |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise | Dedicated support throughout transformation, Training and enablement for teams, Hands-on implementation |
| Founded | 2019 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Wilmington, Delaware, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B · $52M raised | Angel · $1M raised |
| Best for | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels | Large enterprises and IT teams that build and govern custom internal apps on one platform. |
Plans side by side
Kissflow
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
Kissflow
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
- unified enterprise process automation
- ease-of-use with structured workflow governance
- highly rated by business technologists and process owners
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appsmith vs Kissflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsmith-vs-kissflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.